Are you "No Feminists Allowed" material? | Comments

Your quiz results 96%
You scored 96% out of 100%. 96%

Your answers indicate that you are a strict conservative and anti-feminist. You passed the exam in flying colors and will in all likelihood enjoy the No Feminists Allowed blog.

:)

I appreciate this quiz I am 100% not a feminist and even feel nausea when I hear the name! I am a Christian and a female I think the gender roles are the way God intended! Woman are naturally weak and delicate and men are naturally stronger and can put on muscle easier, that is not sexist that is the truth. Thanks for the quiz :)

Hey I'm a girl and this is like a weird test because it's realy inappropriate and for 2 girls aren't like that was this a quiz for girls or boys because I just took it and it was stupid and don't say any thing and because this is a weird quiz but yea and u just got told by a girl

Wait...do i engage in unprovoked...well, yes. Dont all politically active people? This quiz attacks any one who supports civil rights in general does it not?

I know, as an independant voter liberal white pro-human rights male (with an AA in Womens Studies) I wouldnt fit into your site, but I was curious to see how badly. 50%, which is much higher than I expected.

@quiz_admin my previous comment got posted twice, my fault. Sorry. Please feel free to remove one, if you like. Oops.

Your comment, after I took the quiz, made me laugh. No, I am not a feminist, or supporter of them. I was told for years that I needed to get in touch with my feminine side. I searched diligently, but couldn't find a trace of her. I had to conclude that she is either a fairy tail, a hoax, or very good at sneaking around and hiding. No, I do not support homosexuality, bi-sexuality, easy divorce, shacking up, sleeping around or any other kind of sexual lust that is called "love" these days. I remember that even as a kid, I personally felt more like a little boy than I did a little girl. I can't help myself. I think it's genetic. Finally, the feminist of the late 60s' and the 70s', whose personal egos were 12 feet taller than that of the average man, used to call me a pig. I am not a pig. They can call themselves feminist if they want to, after all, it's their team. But they don't get to name my team. We are not "The Pigs", we are masculinists. It's genetic. It's normal. It's natural, and thanks to the feminists, it is getting to be very rare and I suspect some day will become illegal. But for now, I am a geneticallypredispo sedheterosexualmasc ulinist and NOBODY can tell me that lust and love are the same thing. (The divorce rate among heterosexuals does not validate homosexual marriage. It only proves that heterosexual people sometimes also use marriage for a license to sleep with someone)

How to destroy nations with love and tolerance:

youtu be / watch?v=isUSnmOGg08 &NR=1 (no URLs allowed)

Furthermore, your blaming "white males" for the actions of a small percentage of white males -- CENTURIES before we were even born -- is a perfect example of generalizing. I don't see how White Nationalists, who wish to establish their own 100% white nations, should be prohibited from doing so on the basis of OTHER PEOPLE's historical wrongdoings? Would it be fair for Iraqis in the year 2200 to make a statement like: "Well, and actually, white MALES invaded this land" because of the decisions made by George Bush and his Zionist cronies? You can't erase history. You can only move forward. I am not trying to deprive socially liberal whites from living in their desired multicultural society. However, I feel that whites who would prefer to live in a 100% white homeland -- with leaders and policies that are in our best interests -- shouldn't be deprived of this opportunity based on OTHER people's historical actions.

So, for one last time, musicgirl:

DO YOU BELIEVE THAT WHITES SHOULD BE ABLE TO PRESERVE THEIR HERITAGE AND HAVE THEIR OWN HOMELAND, WITH THEIR OWN REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT?

If you answer 'no' to this question, then you are a fascist -- and certainly not T-O-L-E-R-A-N-T of OUR desire to live in our own nations. If you answer 'no', then I don't ever want to hear you accuse anyone of being "intolerant" ever again.

You failed to answer my question, musicgirl. Let me restate the question, this time in all caps:

DO YOU BELIEVE THAT WHITES SHOULD BE ABLE TO PRESERVE THEIR HERITAGE AND HAVE THEIR OWN HOMELAND, WITH THEIR OWN REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT?

As even European countries have been flooded with non-whites, who are rapidly out-reproducing us in our own countries, whites who wish to live in 100% white nations are running out of places to live. Do you see a problem with this? Would you prefer that the "evil" white race -- who came up with countless inventions, including the computer you're currently using -- be wiped off the face of the earth?

Also, were you aware of the fact that non-whites invaded Europe MULTIPLE TIMES, long before we set off for the New World? During the 8th Century, Muslims conquered much of the Iberian Peninsula, and headed into what is now known as France before being driven back by the heroic Charles Martel. The Muslims remained in far Western Europe for centuries (until the end of Reconquista) -- and are now making their return with the assistance of Europe's traitorous liberal governments. Genghis Khan's Mongol army invaded much of Eastern Europe in the 1200s before finally withdrawing eastward. Also, around the time of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, North African pirates raided parts of Europe and enslaved more than a million white European Christians in the 250 years between 1530 and 1780. Did your liberal history teachers teach you that, or did they confine their lessons to "white male aggression"?

This isn't our land. White people didn't "found" this land. We took it from native Americans. Well, and actually, white MALES took this land. And other races are only invading our land as much as we invade others. America has made some huge mistakes. I don't see why you can't admit that. Every country has it's flaws, but it just bothers me that these flaws are often based on race, sexual orientation, or gender, as you seem to believe they should be. You are no better than anyone else. Everyone has their talents, everyone has something they can do better than others, and no one is perfect. d

Whites should be able to live in their own homelands -- but they are deprived of this opportunity. Every white nation on earth -- including European ones -- are being flooded with non-whites without our consent. Do you believe this to be fair, musicgirl? If you are so "fair" and "open-minded," you should agree that whites should be able to preserve their own heritage, in 100% white countries, with a more representative government than we currently have. No race should be deprived of this right.

"Do you believe that slaves should still exist?"

No. Slavery was a big mistake, made by the GREEDY aristocratic class, for which non-aristocratic whites are still suffering the consequences.

"That white men should make more money than anyone else?"

Pay should be strictly meritocratic. This means that RACIST and SEXIST programs like affirmative action -- which provide a systematic advantage to everybody but white males -- should be abolished. Affirmative action is incompatible with equal opportunity, for it does not provide equal opportunity to white males, who are being openly discriminated against.

Also, IsaboeSpeed, your arguments are truly inspiring to me. You make a very clear and good argument.

Yeah, I'm immoral. Do you believe that slaves should still exist? That white men should make more money than anyone else? NEWS FLASH! Society kicked those rules in the ass when they realized how stupid they were. Which was a looooooooong time ago.

musicgirl, you being an immoral, bisexual deviant sucks.

Also, I'm straight, and I still think girls with tattoos are hot.

Hm. Awful quiz. Girls are as important as guys. In every way. It's hard to be a guy, but it's hard to be a girl too. This quiz sucked.

Sorry, here's the correct link: gotoquiz.com / homosexuality_quiz

Take the homosexuality quiz: gotoquiz.com/result s/homosexuality_qui z

Good point. Bye now. (Laughter)

I have a "live and let live" philosophy when it comes to issues like choice of religion and providing parents with the option of homeschooling their children. Such matters are not harmful to other people or to society as a whole. Teenage pregnancies (and unplanned pregnancies) *DO* adversely affect society as a whole, which is why I advocate the elimination of incentives for irresponsible sexual behavior. By using a large share of taxpayer dollars to subsidize said behavior, the government is essentially infringing on the productive class and their wallets.

You're arguments all amount to the same thing: Having people to decide things for others. I've been to hell and back twice on my hands and knees so believe me when i tell you the road to hell is paved with good intentions. I sincerly believe that you're a good person deep down and that you just wanna do what's right. That's all anybody really wants. You're not going to change my mind, I'm not going to change yours. As much as I enjoy a good argument, this argument is pointless. Live and let live. It's all we can do because sadly the future of the human race is not in our hands. I believe that sooner or later humans will make a horribe mistake and it will be the end. We'll all be dead so no worries. There's nothing more I can say, besides goodluck in your life and how you choose to live it.

Based on your state's collective voting record, I would say that most Oklahomans (who, generally speaking, are more conservative-leanin g) are more intelligent and have better morals than you.

Also, I suggest you look in the mirror if you want to find someone who selectively chooses small parts of opposing arguments to rebut. You failed to address many of my points, opting instead for the easier path, which is to fling countless ad hominems and loaded questions in my direction.

You can't have your cake and eat it too. And i don't want some long answer. You're trying to make me feel stupid (That's never gonna work. Just because I'm from Oklahoma doesn't mean I'm not educated) but really all you're doing is wasting both of our time. You obviously don't know much about human nature. One more thing: You keep picking and choosing what comments of mine to answer while not answering the whole and by doing that you're repeating the same points over and over again.

"In other words you support full goverment control."

This couldn't be further from the truth. I am an advocate of limited government, which would entail ZERO reward or incentive for personal irresponsibility. Of course, some rules and regulations would exist on the books, as the complete absence of laws would render the state anarchical. However, only a bloated government -- the polar opposite of my desired limited government -- could allow for the kind of reckless welfare state that we have in place today. A greater degree of government control exists in liberal states like New York and California. Those states have higher taxes, more regulations, and are supported largely by irresponsible, unproductive people who vote for big-government politicians. Your ignorance of big government and what enables its presence is astounding.

Furthermore, my opinions are very much in line with those of the Founding Fathers. It was Thomas Jefferson who stated that "a government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have." Think about that quote for a moment. It relates to what I wrote in the preceding paragraph.

In other words you support full goverment control. I suggest you move to china. Why are you even in America to begin with? I'd swear that when the U.S. became a country it was too libral for you. And don't think I'm being patriotic, because I'm not.