Were gonna have a good day
Thread Topic: Were gonna have a good day
-
people can be glad that someone like him is dead, because if he died of sickness or natural causes, sure, i'd probably be happy too, but it's MURDER. The second you say him getting murdered is good, it blurs the line of what kind of murdered is BAD in your eyes
and im saying that bc ive heard people irl say they're glad he's shot like guys cmon lets have some empathy -
I don't think it's a case of having empathy, but of having a sense of right and wrong. Murder = Bad. If you think that him getting murdered was good, you simply have f---ed up views on what's right and wrong.
-
good point lowkey i agree
-
exactly like at this point people who are glad that hes dead dont want actual peace anymore—theyre just angry
-
"facts have a liberal bias"
yas -
What's really sad is that someone once asked him if violence was the answer for political figures, and he said, "No, violence is never the answer; peace should always be sought first." Like he couldn't have been too, too bad, and he certainly didn't deserve that death, no one does, and maybe his beliefs were crap, but he never hurt anyone. He just used his rights. A right we Americans treasure, and someone decided he should be shot for it, and that's messed up.
-
We as humans should never be the jury, judge, and executioner in someone else's actions, especially when they really didn't do anything wrong. And what's even worse was that his wife and daughter were in the crowd. When his daughter heard the bang, she tried to run for her dad. How sad is that?
-
She is going to have a really hard life after experiencing that. I know when my dad unalived himself, it really affected me, but it has to be TEN TIMES worse for her.
-
*I am just using my past as a point of reference; I am not trying to intrude on this thread.
-
His wife and daughter weren’t in the crowd. They were in another state. It was a lie made up by the right to try and get people to feel more bad. And his beliefs hurt a LOT of people. I think there’s a difference between using freedom of speech and just being plain hateful
-
She doesn't know yet.. I mean, what would you tell to a three year old?
Even if it is a lie, he's a human being. and I think the hateful statement is a little hypocritical in a sense. (I am not grouping you with these people) seeing as to the gun bullet cases engraved with demeaning and insulting words. I also don't believe it was a lie, the first person to say that might have believed that and didn't double check.
No matter where you go, someones belief will hurt another. for example, a pro-lifer is often hurt by the beliefs of a pro-choicer.
I do not agree with what the majority of what Mr Kirk said, how ever, violence is never the answer. he was a human and that is never worth demeaning in any way.
I mean this in respect of sharing my opinion, and I am not demeaning to yours or saying it is initially wrong. just my thoughts.
"The evil men do often lives after them, while the good is oft interred with their bones." -[I]Julius Caeser[/i] -
hate it when my italicize doesn't work
-
Hurt as in the man promoted violence. Hurt as in the man’s beliefs forced women to give birth when they didn’t want to. Hurt as in physical pain and death, not mental hurt (but that too). He promoted gun deaths too so idk that’s just my opinion. I haven’t said anything defending his murderer so don’t hear what I didn’t say. He DID hurt people, which is so much more than using “freedom of speech”, that’s all.
The students and debaters saw it happen, not his kids nor wife. That’s been debunked. I might be wrong though, since there’s no proof they were there, but also no proof they weren’t. -
Sorry, didn't mean to spread misinformation.
-
Oh no i never meant to say you were supporting the murder, sorry!
I’m not sure he really promoted gun violence, a lot of conservatives truly believe that guns are a ticket to self defense and safety, even if they were not. He didn’t really force anyone to do anything, seeing as to he had no political power. He was just a debater. And yeah, he probably did hurt some people, but that doesn’t change that he was a human. Back to the julius caeser thing; he was just doing what he believed to himself to be true, just like you and I are doing right now, and he was deemed too ambitious and was killed. But anyway thats just my thoughts idk i need to think about this a little more.
Post a reply as a guest or Log In
REMEMBER:
- Do not harass or insult other people. Treat others how you'd like to be treated.
View all 10 forum rules
- Do not harass or insult other people. Treat others how you'd like to be treated.
View all 10 forum rules
