...this is pointless
- Locked due to inactivity on Aug 4, '16 4:31pm
Thread Topic: ...this is pointless
-
literally all trans ppl even do is change their pronouns
Like, you can be a boy and wear a dress and there's nothing wrong with it. You can be a girl and have short hair and there's nothing wrong with it.
You don't need to take the pronouns of a girl to wear a dress because dresses are not exclusively girl's clothing.
If gender roles were completely eliminated, which they should be, there would be no need for multiple genders.
Like ppl say "Gender =/= Clothing" but then treat it like if you wear something "feminine" then you're a girl. It's literally just pronouns?? -
like I didn't understand gender abolitionists before but now I kinda get it, it's just gender roles and pronouns and it's unnecessary
-
I would tap both of them.
The girl because I know she's a she.
The boy because pretending is awesome. -
same
-
***with their consent first
-
And I don't know why, but when an attractive girl dresses atleast some-what like a boy, it just turns me on.
But when a rather effeminate-looking boy --
Ok effeminate-looking boys just turn me on. -
..
ok but
a dude wearing a dress isn't "feminine" it's just a dude wearing a dress and it's ok -
Effeminate.
And though slightly, it does make him more feminine. As long as he's doing it for him-self and not for any-one else or for the lulz. -
But bro, that ain't bad.
-
Eh same thing ??
Not really. Dresses aren't feminine. Clothes are completely gender-neutral. Plus, you wouldn't say a woman wearing pants is dressing masculine. That's just gender roles that need to be abolished. -
Gender roles completely define the word feminine.
-
Geek's right.
And gender roles? It depends on how aggressively you want to handle it, how you view it, and the actual problems caused by it.
I've met more than one person who said, roughly, "lol, we need 2 abolish gender roles completely cuz I dun wanna wear a bra". They want to completely demolish gender conditions which would cause major sexual confusions, statistical negation, and boys wearing tampons. Gender conditions serve a purpose and some are backed by legitimate reasoning, others simply consensus.
Although, some others are complete bull-s---, such as the well-known sexual orientation problem, guys are "gay" for wearing rings/non-gangster necklaces and that a girl's a lesbian if she wears knee-length shorts. -
And that women belong in the kitchen, of which I completely disagree with.
They belong in the kitchen AND the bedroom, depending on their superior husband's wishes.
jkjkjkjkjkjk. -
Yee, Geek's right. I don't like the words "feminine" and "masculine."
-
Wait wtf
"sexual confusions"?
..can you explain that?
This thread is locked, therefore no new posts can be made.
